vs Pale-faced Bat

Opegrapha rupestris compared with Phylloderma stenops

Key Differences

• is Critically Endangered while Pale-faced Bat is Least Concern.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank		Pale-faced Bat
Kingdom	Fungi (Fungi)	Animalia (Animals)
Phylum	Ascomycota (Sac Fungi)	Chordata (Chordates)
Class	Lecanoromycetes (Lecanoromycetes)	Mammalia (Mammals)
Order	Ostropales (Ostropales)	Chiroptera (Bats)
Family	Graphidaceae	Phyllostomidae
Genus	Opegrapha	Phylloderma
Species	Opegrapha rupestris	Phylloderma stenops

Conservation Status

CR — Critically Endangered

Pale-faced Bat

LC — Least Concern

Physical Characteristics

Attribute		Pale-faced Bat
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

Habitat

Found across multiple habitat types including temperate broadleaf and mixed forests, temperate coniferous forests, and boreal forests and taiga, among 5 distinct biome types within the Palearctic biogeographic realm. Populations are also found in montane and highland environments at higher elevations.

Range

Distributed across Denmark, Norway, Portugal, and Sweden. Currently classified as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List, this species faces significant conservation challenges across its range.

Pale-faced Bat

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Range

Distributed across Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela.