Fragrant Funnel vs Lamulate Shrew
Clitocybe fragrans compared with Chodsigoa lamula
Taxonomic Classification
| Rank | Fragrant Funnel | Lamulate Shrew |
|---|---|---|
| Kingdom | Fungi (Fungi) | Animalia (Animals) |
| Phylum | Basidiomycota (Club Fungi) | Chordata (Chordates) |
| Class | Agaricomycetes (Mushrooms) | Mammalia (Mammals) |
| Order | Agaricales (Gilled Mushrooms) | Soricomorpha (Soricomorpha) |
| Family | Tricholomataceae | Soricidae |
| Genus | Clitocybe | Chodsigoa |
| Species | Clitocybe fragrans | Chodsigoa lamula |
Conservation Status
Fragrant Funnel
LC — Least ConcernLamulate Shrew
LC — Least ConcernPhysical Characteristics
| Attribute | Fragrant Funnel | Lamulate Shrew |
|---|---|---|
| Diet | — | — |
| Average Lifespan | — | — |
| Average Length | — | — |
| Average Weight | — | — |
Habitat & Geographic Range
Fragrant Funnel
Habitat
Typically found in forest floors, decomposing wood, and soil ecosystems.
Range
Distributed across Belgium, Norway, and Sweden.
Lamulate Shrew
Habitat
Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.
Fragrant Funnel
No description available.
Lamulate Shrew
No description available.
Related Comparisons
Nature FYI Family
Explore more of the natural world across our sister sites.
🐦
🐟
🦕
🌿
BirdFYI
11,000+ Bird Species
FishFYI
Fish & Marine Life
DinoFYI
6,000+ Dinosaurs
PlantFYI
379,000+ Plants
Part of the Nature FYI family — FYIPedia