Coachwhip ray vs Himalayan Field Mouse

Urogymnus granulatus compared with Apodemus pallipes

Key Differences

• Coachwhip ray is Vulnerable while Himalayan Field Mouse is Least Concern.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	Coachwhip ray	Himalayan Field Mouse
Kingdom same	Animalia (Animals)	Animalia (Animals)
Phylum same	Chordata (Chordates)	Chordata (Chordates)
Class	Elasmobranchii	Mammalia (Mammals)
Order	Myliobatiformes (Myliobatiformes)	Rodentia (Rodents)
Family	Dasyatidae	Muridae (Mice & Rats)
Genus	Urogymnus	Apodemus
Species	Urogymnus granulatus	Apodemus pallipes

Evolutionary Relationship

Coachwhip ray and Himalayan Field Mouse share a common ancestor at the Phylum level: Chordata. (Chordates)

Conservation Status

Coachwhip ray

VU — Vulnerable

Himalayan Field Mouse

LC — Least Concern

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	Coachwhip ray	Himalayan Field Mouse
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

Coachwhip ray

Himalayan Field Mouse

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Coachwhip ray

The coachwhip ray, Urogymnus granulatus, is a large elasmobranch in the family Urogymidae found across the Indo-Pacific region, ranging from the Red Sea and East Africa through South and Southeast Asia to northern Australia and the western Pacific islands. It inhabits shallow coastal waters including coral reef flats, sandy lagoons, seagrass beds, and estuarine habitats, where it forages for benthic invertebrates and small fishes buried in the substrate. The coachwhip ray is characterized by an oval disc and a long, whip-like tail with one or more venomous spines at its base, giving the species its common name. The disc reaches up to 1.4 meters in width, making it one of the larger members of its family. Urogymnus granulatus is ovoviviparous, giving birth to live young after internal development, and has low reproductive rates that make populations slow to recover from exploitation. The species is classified as Vulnerable by the IUCN due to significant declines caused by intensive coastal fisheries across its range, particularly in South and Southeast Asia where it is commonly caught as bycatch or targeted for its valuable meat, skin, and gill plates in local markets. Habitat degradation from coastal development and coral reef decline compounds the threat to wild populations.