Chestnut dunnart vs Fragrant Funnel

Sminthopsis archeri compared with Clitocybe fragrans

Key Differences

• Chestnut dunnart is Data Deficient while Fragrant Funnel is Least Concern.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	Chestnut dunnart	Fragrant Funnel
Kingdom	Animalia (Animals)	Fungi (Fungi)
Phylum	Chordata (Chordates)	Basidiomycota (Club Fungi)
Class	Mammalia (Mammals)	Agaricomycetes (Mushrooms)
Order	Dasyuromorphia (Dasyuromorphia)	Agaricales (Gilled Mushrooms)
Family	Dasyuridae	Tricholomataceae
Genus	Sminthopsis	Clitocybe
Species	Sminthopsis archeri	Clitocybe fragrans

Conservation Status

Chestnut dunnart

DD — Data Deficient

Fragrant Funnel

LC — Least Concern

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	Chestnut dunnart	Fragrant Funnel
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

Chestnut dunnart

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Fragrant Funnel

Habitat

Typically found in forest floors, decomposing wood, and soil ecosystems.

Range

Distributed across Belgium, Norway, and Sweden.

Chestnut dunnart

The Chestnut dunnart (Sminthopsis archeri) is a species in the genus Sminthopsis. It is currently classified as Data Deficient on the IUCN Red List. Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.