Campbell Islands Teal vs Common Hooktail

Anas nesiotis compared with Paragomphus genei

Key Differences

• Campbell Islands Teal is Vulnerable while Common Hooktail is Least Concern.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	Campbell Islands Teal	Common Hooktail
Kingdom same	Animalia (Animals)	Animalia (Animals)
Phylum	Chordata (Chordates)	Arthropoda (Arthropods)
Class	Aves (Birds)	Insecta (Insects)
Order	Anseriformes (Anseriformes)	Odonata (Odonata)
Family	Anatidae	Gomphidae
Genus	Anas	Paragomphus
Species	Anas nesiotis	Paragomphus genei

Evolutionary Relationship

Campbell Islands Teal and Common Hooktail share a common ancestor at the Kingdom level: Animalia. (Animals)

Conservation Status

Campbell Islands Teal

VU — Vulnerable

Common Hooktail

LC — Least Concern

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	Campbell Islands Teal	Common Hooktail
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

Campbell Islands Teal

Habitat

Typically found in various aerial, terrestrial, and aquatic environments.

Range

Found in Norway. Currently classified as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List, this species faces significant conservation challenges across its range.

Common Hooktail

Habitat

Typically found in virtually all terrestrial and freshwater habitats.

Campbell Islands Teal

The Campbell Islands Teal (Anas nesiotis) is a species in the genus Anas. It is currently classified as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List. Found in Norway. Currently classified as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List, this species faces significant conservation challenges across its range.

Common Hooktail

<em>Paragomphus genei</em>, commonly known as the common hooktail, is a dragonfly in the family Gomphidae. It is classified as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List, suggesting a stable and widespread population. The species is noted to occupy virtually all terrestrial and freshwater habitats within its range, reflecting considerable ecological generalism typical of many gomphid dragonflies. Specific country-level distribution records for this species are not detailed in current data, though the breadth of habitat use implies a relatively wide geographic range across suitable regions. Diet information for this species is not available in current records. Biological traits of this species remain poorly documented in the scientific literature.