bilby vs Chinese Shrew

Macrotis lagotis compared with Sorex sinalis

Key Differences

  • bilby is Vulnerable while Chinese Shrew is Data Deficient.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank bilby Chinese Shrew
Kingdom same Animalia (Animals) Animalia (Animals)
Phylum same Chordata (Chordates) Chordata (Chordates)
Class same Mammalia (Mammals) Mammalia (Mammals)
Order Peramelemorphia (Peramelemorphia) Soricomorpha (Soricomorpha)
Family Thylacomyidae Soricidae
Genus Macrotis Sorex
Species Macrotis lagotis Sorex sinalis

Evolutionary Relationship

bilby and Chinese Shrew share a common ancestor at the Class level: Mammalia. (Mammals)

Conservation Status

bilby

VU — Vulnerable

Chinese Shrew

DD — Data Deficient

Physical Characteristics

Attribute bilby Chinese Shrew
Diet
Average Lifespan
Average Length
Average Weight

Habitat & Geographic Range

bilby

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Chinese Shrew

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

bilby

The Bilby (Macrotis lagotis) is a species in the genus Macrotis. It is currently classified as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List. Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Chinese Shrew

The Chinese Shrew (Sorex sinalis) is a species in the genus Sorex. It is currently classified as Data Deficient on the IUCN Red List.

Nature FYI Family

Explore more of the natural world across our sister sites.

Part of the Nature FYI family — FYIPedia