Anderson s Shrew Mole vs wild cotoneaster

Uropsilus andersoni compared with Cotoneaster integerrimus

Key Differences

  • Anderson s Shrew Mole is Data Deficient while wild cotoneaster is Least Concern.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank Anderson s Shrew Mole wild cotoneaster
Kingdom Animalia (Animals) Plantae (Plants)
Phylum Chordata (Chordates) Magnoliophyta (Flowering Plants)
Class Mammalia (Mammals) Magnoliopsida (Dicots)
Order Soricomorpha (Soricomorpha) Rosales (Roses & Allies)
Family Talpidae Rosaceae (Rose Family)
Genus Uropsilus Cotoneaster
Species Uropsilus andersoni Cotoneaster integerrimus

Conservation Status

Anderson s Shrew Mole

DD — Data Deficient

wild cotoneaster

LC — Least Concern

Physical Characteristics

Attribute Anderson s Shrew Mole wild cotoneaster
Diet
Average Lifespan
Average Length
Average Weight

Habitat & Geographic Range

Anderson s Shrew Mole

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

wild cotoneaster

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial habitats from tropical forests to temperate regions.

Range

Found across Europe (6 countries).

Anderson s Shrew Mole

The Anderson s Shrew Mole (Uropsilus andersoni) is a species in the genus Uropsilus. Its conservation status is listed as Data Deficient, indicating insufficient data for assessment. Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

wild cotoneaster

No description available.

Nature FYI Family

Explore more of the natural world across our sister sites.

Part of the Nature FYI family — FYIPedia