Common Pond Frog vs 海陆蛙

Fejervarya vittigera compared with Fejervarya moodiei

Key Differences

• Common Pond Frog is Least Concern while 海陆蛙 is Data Deficient.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	Common Pond Frog	海陆蛙
Kingdom same	Animalia (动物界)	Animalia (动物界)
Phylum same	Chordata (脊索动物门)	Chordata (脊索动物门)
Class same	Amphibia (两栖动物)	Amphibia (两栖动物)
Order same	Anura (无尾目)	Anura (无尾目)
Family same	Dicroglossidae	Dicroglossidae
Genus same	Fejervarya	Fejervarya
Species	Fejervarya vittigera	Fejervarya moodiei

Evolutionary Relationship

Common Pond Frog and 海陆蛙 share a common ancestor at the Genus level: Fejervarya.

Conservation Status

Common Pond Frog

LC — Least Concern

海陆蛙

DD — Data Deficient

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	Common Pond Frog	海陆蛙
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

Common Pond Frog

Habitat

Typically found in freshwater habitats, moist forests, and wetlands.

海陆蛙

Habitat

Typically found in freshwater habitats, moist forests, and wetlands.

Common Pond Frog

<em>Fejervarya vittigera</em>, the common pond frog, is a dicroglossid frog in the family Dicroglossidae, adapted to freshwater and wetland habitats including rice paddies, ponds, marshes, streams, and irrigated agricultural fields. It is typically a robust, medium-sized frog with a brown or olive-grey dorsum marked with longitudinal ridges and variable patterns, well suited for camouflage in its aquatic and semi-aquatic environments. The species is broadly distributed across South and Southeast Asia, favouring lowland areas with permanent or seasonal water availability. <em>Fejervarya vittigera</em> is carnivorous, typically feeding on invertebrates including insects, worms, and small crustaceans encountered near the water's edge or within aquatic vegetation. It is assessed as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List, with populations generally considered stable across its wide range, supported by its tolerance of modified habitats such as rice paddies. Biological traits such as average adult lifespan, precise body dimensions, body mass, and comprehensive dietary data across its geographic range remain poorly documented in the scientific literature. The species may face localised pressures from pesticide use in agricultural areas and habitat drainage.