Common Pond Frog vs Large False Serotine

Fejervarya vittigera compared with Hesperoptenus tomesi

Key Differences

• Common Pond Frog is Least Concern while Large False Serotine is Vulnerable.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	Common Pond Frog	Large False Serotine
Kingdom same	Animalia (สัตว์)	Animalia (สัตว์)
Phylum same	Chordata (สัตว์มีแกนสันหลัง)	Chordata (สัตว์มีแกนสันหลัง)
Class	Amphibia (สัตว์สะเทินน้ำสะเทินบก)	Mammalia (สัตว์เลี้ยงลูกด้วยน้ำนม)
Order	Anura (อันดับกบ)	Chiroptera (ค้างคาว)
Family	Dicroglossidae	Vespertilionidae
Genus	Fejervarya	Hesperoptenus
Species	Fejervarya vittigera	Hesperoptenus tomesi

Evolutionary Relationship

Common Pond Frog and Large False Serotine share a common ancestor at the Phylum level: Chordata. (สัตว์มีแกนสันหลัง)

Conservation Status

Common Pond Frog

LC — Least Concern

Large False Serotine

VU — Vulnerable

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	Common Pond Frog	Large False Serotine
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

Common Pond Frog

Habitat

Typically found in freshwater habitats, moist forests, and wetlands.

Large False Serotine

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Common Pond Frog

<em>Fejervarya vittigera</em>, the common pond frog, is a dicroglossid frog in the family Dicroglossidae, adapted to freshwater and wetland habitats including rice paddies, ponds, marshes, streams, and irrigated agricultural fields. It is typically a robust, medium-sized frog with a brown or olive-grey dorsum marked with longitudinal ridges and variable patterns, well suited for camouflage in its aquatic and semi-aquatic environments. The species is broadly distributed across South and Southeast Asia, favouring lowland areas with permanent or seasonal water availability. <em>Fejervarya vittigera</em> is carnivorous, typically feeding on invertebrates including insects, worms, and small crustaceans encountered near the water's edge or within aquatic vegetation. It is assessed as Least Concern on the IUCN Red List, with populations generally considered stable across its wide range, supported by its tolerance of modified habitats such as rice paddies. Biological traits such as average adult lifespan, precise body dimensions, body mass, and comprehensive dietary data across its geographic range remain poorly documented in the scientific literature. The species may face localised pressures from pesticide use in agricultural areas and habitat drainage.