Fatfoot Pocket-moss vs fendule minime

Fissidens crassipes compared with Fissidens exilis

Key Differences

• Fatfoot Pocket-moss is Critically Endangered while fendule minime is Near Threatened.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	Fatfoot Pocket-moss	fendule minime
Kingdom same	Plantae (plante)	Plantae (plante)
Phylum same	Bryophyta	Bryophyta
Class same	Bryopsida (Bryopsida)	Bryopsida (Bryopsida)
Order same	Dicranales (Dicranales)	Dicranales (Dicranales)
Family same	Fissidentaceae	Fissidentaceae
Genus same	Fissidens	Fissidens
Species	Fissidens crassipes	Fissidens exilis

Evolutionary Relationship

Fatfoot Pocket-moss and fendule minime share a common ancestor at the Genus level: Fissidens.

Conservation Status

Fatfoot Pocket-moss

CR — Critically Endangered

fendule minime

NT — Near Threatened

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	Fatfoot Pocket-moss	fendule minime
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

Fatfoot Pocket-moss

Habitat

Native to Europe, inhabiting ecosystems characteristic of the region.

Range

Distributed across Belgium, Luxembourg, Norway, and Sweden. Currently classified as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List, this species faces significant conservation challenges across its range.

fendule minime

Habitat

Native to Europe and North America, inhabiting ecosystems characteristic of the region.

Range

Found across Europe (5 countries) and North America (United States). Listed as Near Threatened, this species requires ongoing monitoring to prevent population decline.

Shared Countries

Both species can be found in 4 countries:

🇧🇪 Belgium 🇱🇺 Luxembourg 🇳🇴 Norway 🇸🇪 Sweden