faux-dicrane arctique vs Lombok Flying Fox

Arctoa anderssonii compared with Pteropus lombocensis

Key Differences

• faux-dicrane arctique is Endangered while Lombok Flying Fox is Data Deficient.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	faux-dicrane arctique	Lombok Flying Fox
Kingdom	Plantae (plante)	Animalia (animal)
Phylum	Bryophyta	Chordata (Chordates)
Class	Bryopsida (Bryopsida)	Mammalia (mammifères)
Order	Dicranales (Dicranales)	Chiroptera (Bats)
Family	Rhabdoweisiaceae	Pteropodidae (Fruit Bats)
Genus	Arctoa	Pteropus (Flying Foxes)
Species	Arctoa anderssonii	Pteropus lombocensis

Conservation Status

faux-dicrane arctique

EN — Endangered

Lombok Flying Fox

DD — Data Deficient

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	faux-dicrane arctique	Lombok Flying Fox
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

faux-dicrane arctique

Habitat

Native to Europe, inhabiting ecosystems characteristic of the region.

Range

Distributed across Norway and Sweden. Currently classified as Endangered on the IUCN Red List, this species faces significant conservation challenges across its range.

Lombok Flying Fox

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

faux-dicrane arctique

The Andersson's arctic moss (Arctoa anderssonii) is a species in the genus Arctoa. It is currently classified as Endangered on the IUCN Red List. Native to Europe, inhabiting ecosystems characteristic of the region.