faux-dicrane arctique vs hop dodder

Arctoa anderssonii compared with Cuscuta lupuliformis

Key Differences

• faux-dicrane arctique is Endangered while hop dodder is Not Evaluated.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	faux-dicrane arctique	hop dodder
Kingdom same	Plantae (plante)	Plantae (plante)
Phylum	Bryophyta	Magnoliophyta (Flowering Plants)
Class	Bryopsida (Bryopsida)	Magnoliopsida (Dicots)
Order	Dicranales (Dicranales)	Solanales (Solanales)
Family	Rhabdoweisiaceae	Convolvulaceae
Genus	Arctoa	Cuscuta
Species	Arctoa anderssonii	Cuscuta lupuliformis

Evolutionary Relationship

faux-dicrane arctique and hop dodder share a common ancestor at the Kingdom level: Plantae. (plante)

Conservation Status

faux-dicrane arctique

EN — Endangered

hop dodder

NE — Not Evaluated

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	faux-dicrane arctique	hop dodder
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

faux-dicrane arctique

Habitat

Native to Europe, inhabiting ecosystems characteristic of the region.

Range

Distributed across Norway and Sweden. Currently classified as Endangered on the IUCN Red List, this species faces significant conservation challenges across its range.

hop dodder

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial habitats from tropical forests to temperate regions.

Range

Found across Europe (8 countries).

faux-dicrane arctique

The Andersson's arctic moss (Arctoa anderssonii) is a species in the genus Arctoa. It is currently classified as Endangered on the IUCN Red List. Native to Europe, inhabiting ecosystems characteristic of the region.

Shared Countries

Both species can be found in 1 countries:

🇸🇪 Sweden