faux-dicrane arctique vs Gudaur Snow Vole

Arctoa anderssonii compared with Chionomys gud

Key Differences

• faux-dicrane arctique is Endangered while Gudaur Snow Vole is Least Concern.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	faux-dicrane arctique	Gudaur Snow Vole
Kingdom	Plantae (plante)	Animalia (animal)
Phylum	Bryophyta	Chordata (Chordates)
Class	Bryopsida (Bryopsida)	Mammalia (mammifères)
Order	Dicranales (Dicranales)	Rodentia (Rodents)
Family	Rhabdoweisiaceae	Cricetidae
Genus	Arctoa	Chionomys
Species	Arctoa anderssonii	Chionomys gud

Conservation Status

faux-dicrane arctique

EN — Endangered

Gudaur Snow Vole

LC — Least Concern

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	faux-dicrane arctique	Gudaur Snow Vole
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

faux-dicrane arctique

Habitat

Native to Europe, inhabiting ecosystems characteristic of the region.

Range

Distributed across Norway and Sweden. Currently classified as Endangered on the IUCN Red List, this species faces significant conservation challenges across its range.

Gudaur Snow Vole

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

faux-dicrane arctique

The Andersson's arctic moss (Arctoa anderssonii) is a species in the genus Arctoa. It is currently classified as Endangered on the IUCN Red List. Native to Europe, inhabiting ecosystems characteristic of the region.