faux-dicrane arctique vs campagnol des champs

Arctoa anderssonii compared with Microtus arvalis

Key Differences

• faux-dicrane arctique is Endangered while campagnol des champs is Near Threatened.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	faux-dicrane arctique	campagnol des champs
Kingdom	Plantae (plante)	Animalia (animal)
Phylum	Bryophyta	Chordata (Chordates)
Class	Bryopsida (Bryopsida)	Mammalia (mammifères)
Order	Dicranales (Dicranales)	Rodentia (Rodents)
Family	Rhabdoweisiaceae	Cricetidae
Genus	Arctoa	Microtus
Species	Arctoa anderssonii	Microtus arvalis

Conservation Status

faux-dicrane arctique

EN — Endangered

campagnol des champs

NT — Near Threatened

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	faux-dicrane arctique	campagnol des champs
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

faux-dicrane arctique

Habitat

Native to Europe, inhabiting ecosystems characteristic of the region.

Range

Distributed across Norway and Sweden. Currently classified as Endangered on the IUCN Red List, this species faces significant conservation challenges across its range.

campagnol des champs

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Range

Found across Europe (6 countries). Listed as Near Threatened, this species requires ongoing monitoring to prevent population decline.

faux-dicrane arctique

The Andersson's arctic moss (Arctoa anderssonii) is a species in the genus Arctoa. It is currently classified as Endangered on the IUCN Red List. Native to Europe, inhabiting ecosystems characteristic of the region.

campagnol des champs

common vole (Microtus arvalis) is classified as Near Threatened (NT) on the IUCN Red List. Close to qualifying as threatened, with populations that may become vulnerable without conservation action.

Shared Countries

Both species can be found in 2 countries:

🇳🇴 Norway 🇸🇪 Sweden