Schuppenkotinga vs Stingray

Ampelioides tschudii compared with Urogymnus lobistoma

Key Differences

• Schuppenkotinga is Least Concern while Stingray is Endangered.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	Schuppenkotinga	Stingray
Kingdom same	Animalia (Tier)	Animalia (Tier)
Phylum same	Chordata (Chordatiere)	Chordata (Chordatiere)
Class	Aves (Vögel)	Elasmobranchii
Order	Passeriformes (Sperlingsvögel)	Myliobatiformes (Stechrochenartige)
Family	Cotingidae	Dasyatidae
Genus	Ampelioides	Urogymnus
Species	Ampelioides tschudii	Urogymnus lobistoma

Evolutionary Relationship

Schuppenkotinga and Stingray share a common ancestor at the Phylum level: Chordata. (Chordatiere)

Conservation Status

Schuppenkotinga

LC — Least Concern

Stingray

EN — Endangered

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	Schuppenkotinga	Stingray
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

Schuppenkotinga

Habitat

Typically found in various aerial, terrestrial, and aquatic environments.

Range

Distributed across Colombia, Ecuador, Norway, and Venezuela.

Stingray

Schuppenkotinga

Scaled Fruiteater (Ampelioides tschudii) is classified as Least Concern (LC) on the IUCN Red List. Widespread and abundant across its range, with stable populations and no immediate conservation concerns.