Dachs vs Sand-Filzbiene

Meles meles compared with Epeolus cruciger

Key Differences

• Dachs is Vulnerable while Sand-Filzbiene is Least Concern.

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	Dachs	Sand-Filzbiene
Kingdom same	Animalia (Tier)	Animalia (Tier)
Phylum	Chordata (Chordatiere)	Arthropoda (Gliederfüßer)
Class	Mammalia (Säugetiere)	Insecta (Insekten)
Order	Carnivora (Raubtiere)	Hymenoptera (Hautflügler)
Family	Mustelidae (Weasels & Otters)	Apidae (Bees)
Genus	Meles	Epeolus
Species	Meles meles	Epeolus cruciger

Evolutionary Relationship

Dachs and Sand-Filzbiene share a common ancestor at the Kingdom level: Animalia. (Tier)

Conservation Status

Dachs

VU — Vulnerable

Sand-Filzbiene

LC — Least Concern

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	Dachs	Sand-Filzbiene
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

Dachs

Habitat

Inhabits Mediterranean forests and woodlands within the Palearctic biogeographic realm. Populations are also found in montane and highland environments at higher elevations.

Range

Found across Europe (6 countries). Currently classified as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List, this species faces significant conservation challenges across its range.

Sand-Filzbiene

Habitat

Typically found in virtually all terrestrial and freshwater habitats.

Range

Distributed across Belgium, Denmark, Luxembourg, Norway, and Sweden.

Dachs

Eurasian badger (Meles meles) is classified as Vulnerable (VU) on the IUCN Red List. Facing a high risk of endangerment in the wild, with declining populations and increasing habitat pressure.

Shared Countries

Both species can be found in 4 countries:

🇧🇪 Belgium 🇩🇰 Denmark 🇳🇴 Norway 🇸🇪 Sweden