Erz-Kanalläufer vs Fernando-Po-Ducker

Amara aenea compared with Cephalophus ogilbyi

Taxonomic Classification

Rank	Erz-Kanalläufer	Fernando-Po-Ducker
Kingdom same	Animalia (Tier)	Animalia (Tier)
Phylum	Arthropoda (Gliederfüßer)	Chordata (Chordatiere)
Class	Insecta (Insekten)	Mammalia (Säugetiere)
Order	Coleoptera (Käfer)	Artiodactyla (Paarhufer)
Family	Carabidae	Bovidae (Bovids)
Genus	Amara	Cephalophus
Species	Amara aenea	Cephalophus ogilbyi

Evolutionary Relationship

Erz-Kanalläufer and Fernando-Po-Ducker share a common ancestor at the Kingdom level: Animalia. (Tier)

Conservation Status

Erz-Kanalläufer

LC — Least Concern

Fernando-Po-Ducker

LC — Least Concern

Physical Characteristics

Attribute	Erz-Kanalläufer	Fernando-Po-Ducker
Diet	—	—
Average Lifespan	—	—
Average Length	—	—
Average Weight	—	—

Habitat & Geographic Range

Erz-Kanalläufer

Habitat

Typically found in virtually all terrestrial and freshwater habitats.

Range

Found across Europe (7 countries) and North America (Canada, United States).

Fernando-Po-Ducker

Habitat

Typically found in diverse terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Erz-Kanalläufer

<em>Amara aenea</em>, the common sun beetle, is a carabid ground beetle in the family Carabidae, order Coleoptera. It is broadly distributed across Europe and has been introduced to North America, typically inhabiting open, sunny habitats such as arable fields, grasslands, sandy heathlands, and disturbed ground with sparse vegetation. Adults are omnivorous, feeding on seeds, small invertebrates, and plant material, and are considered important predators of weed seeds in agricultural systems. <em>Amara aenea</em> is surface-active during warm, dry conditions, typically exhibiting peak activity in late spring and summer. Like many carabid beetles, it is nocturnal and shelters under stones and debris during the day. Larvae develop in the soil, where they also feed on organic matter and small invertebrates. Biological traits including precise adult lifespan, body length measurements, and detailed prey preferences remain poorly documented at the species level. The species is assessed as Least Concern by the IUCN, reflecting its wide distribution, high adaptability to disturbed environments, and no significant known threats to global population status.